If you are interested in our coaching services You are a wonderful resource to students for exploring career fields, polishing their job-search skills or understanding the recruiting process. You know the curriculum, you recognize the quality of students and faculty, and you understand how this background fits into your own chosen profession. Below are some of the ways we ask alumni to engage with students. Meet informally over breakfast or lunch to discuss your career and provide feedback to a smaller group of students on their interest in your field.
Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. Many experts try to find the best style to be a leader because only one leadership style as in the previous era seems too simple and is not effective anymore.
However, no matter what types of leader that the management chooses, they also have advantages and disadvantages that depend on each situation.
Therefore, the positive and negative aspects of each leadership style and how to implement to handle circumstances in this modern world will be discussed in this essay. First of all, the first leadership style that will be mentioned in this essay is the coercive style.
It works well in contingency situations. Leaders of this structure will give clear directions and processes to their subordinates.
Undoubtedly, it would seem that there are more drawbacks than benefits. Most leaders have a big gap between top levels and low levels relationship. Moreover, employees tend to feel bored easily because they rarely create their ideas or share opinions. They just work like robots. As a result of that management level should consider carefully before using this way.
Therefore, coercive style is the most effective way to handle problems in urgent situation but do not use it for too long time. Secondly, it cannot be denied that the democratic style is one of popular leadership styles.
This style encourages people to participate in every stage of works. Lewin and Lippitt illustrated that democratic leaders relied on group activity, energetic teammates association, honest admire and condemnation, and a degree of companionship.
All group members will make a decision together. This method gives the effective result if manager would like teams to create new ideas and take full responsibility for their works. They are motivated to share their opinions. Moreover, this approach enables teammates to work in freestyle and built quality teamwork.
On the other hand, there are some weaknesses which are concerned. Not only does it cause work to be slow, it also awfully affects less skilled employees. This method gives less production if used in time-limited situation because people usually need plenty of time to work out and analyze problems.
In addition, they might feel adrift and cannot understand the aims. Thus, people play a big role in this style while leader is just an advisor. Employees will get opportunity to learn how to work in step by step.
In modern world, coaching style is popular; more companies tend to concentrate on developing staff more than previous decade. Benincasa cited in Peters, The good points of this approach are that company will get more quality, more intelligent employees in long term.
Furthermore, all subsidiaries will take responsibility and take ownership in their works. Surely, developing resources take too long time to train staff so it is not effective in short period and this style is not work good with inactive subsidiaries.
Plus, they might waste their time and money for free if their crews resign before finishing the process or during training period. Ultimately, in terms of investment, coaching style is high cost.
Subordinates usually acquire the good training programmes or beneficial seminars which lead to the huge budget. Hence, coaching style is better for employee than corporation.
You can employ more leadership styles which rely on the situation that you meet. Moreover, I totally agree with Benincasa who stated that: Local managers will order directions to quickly respond to customers who are being upset or worried as soon as possible. Increasingly, they also encourage subordinates to enhance themselves by arranging brilliant training programmes.
Enterprise, Management Trainee Project is a good example, attendants study about marketing, finance, operations, sales and customer service.
In conclusion, in this unpredictable time, there is no correct answer what is the best leadership approach which we should use.This free Management essay on Essay: Leadership theory is perfect for Management students to use as an example. 🔥Citing and more! Add citations directly into your paper, Check for unintentional plagiarism and check for writing mistakes.
This leadership styles also has his advantages and disadvantages, but it is also important to know that some of them damages organizations in long-term by reducing flexibility and dedication of employees.
For these reasons my leadership style is best reflected in the transformational model of leadership.
By definition, a transformation leader is a “leader who motivates followers to perform to their full potential over time by influencing a change in perceptions and by providing a sense of direction. Writing a leadership essay is not as complex as it seems.
You need to understand who a leader is before you can write about them. A leader is defined as any individual who has the power to influence, motivate, and even exhort his peers and people in general to achieve their set goals.
While working as interns, we were tasked with the project of collecting different leadership games to be used for a leadership camp of high school students.