During your interview, you will be asked questions, and you are expected to ask intelligent questions. Here are some examples to help you:
Posted on December 12, by Scott Alexander Aquinas famously said: For example, take medical research. Suppose a certain drug is weakly effective against a certain disease.
After a few years, a bunch of different research groups have gotten their hands on it and done all sorts of different studies. But there will also be random noise caused by inevitable variation and by some of the experiments being better quality than others.
In the end, we might expect something looking kind of like a bell curve. We see that the peak of the curve is somewhere to the right of neutral — ie weakly effective — and that there are about 15 studies that find this correct result. But there are also about 5 studies that find that the drug is very good, and 5 studies missing the sign entirely and finding that the drug is actively bad.
Questions for thesis is before we get into fraud or statistical malpractice. As we increase experimental rigor, the bell curve might get squashed horizontally, but there will still be a bell curve.
But maybe Questions for thesis drug is more effective in bipolar i than in bipolar ii Depakote, for example Or maybe the drug is very effective against bipolar mania, but much less effective against bipolar depression Depakote again.
And the latest study shows that their drug is great! Or they could add all of those studies about slightly different things. Depakote is ineffective at treating bipolar depression. Depakote is ineffective at maintenance bipolar therapy. Depakote is ineffective at bipolar ii.
I think medical science is still pretty healthy, and that the consensus of doctors and researchers is more-or-less right on most controversial medical issues. Like, take the minimum wage question please. We all know about the Krueger and Card study in New Jersey that found no evidence that high minimum wages hurt the economy.
We probably also know the counterclaims that it was completely debunked as despicable dishonest statistical malpractice.
Maybe some of us know Card and Krueger wrote a pretty convincing rebuttal of those claims. Or that a bunch of large and methodologically advanced studies have come out since then, some finding no effect like Dubeothers finding strong effects like Rubinstein and Wither.
These are just examples; there are at least dozens and probably hundreds of studies on both sides. But we can solve this with meta-analyses and systemtic reviews, right? Depends which one you want. Do you go with this meta-analysis of fourteen studies that shows that any presumed negative effect of high minimum wages is likely publication bias?
With this meta-analysis of sixty-four studies that finds the same thing and discovers no effect of minimum wage after correcting for the problem?
Or how about this meta-analysis of fifty-five countries that does find effects in most of them? Maybe you prefer this systematic review of a hundred or so studies that finds strong and consistent effects? Can we trust news sources, think tanks, econblogs, and other institutions to sum up the state of the evidence?
The weight of the evidence is that such impacts are small to none. They seem like experts. What do they think? Well, five hundred economists signed a letter to policy makers saying that the science of economics shows increasing the minimum wage would be a bad idea.
That sounds like a promising consensus…. Only 6 percent feel that minimum wage hikes are an efficient way to alleviate poverty. But unless you look very very hard, you will never know that. If you are a conservative, what you will find on the sites you trust will be something like this: Economic theory has always shown that minimum wage increases decrease employment, but the Left has never been willing to accept this basic fact.
Inthey trumpeted a single study by Card and Krueger that purported to show no negative effects from a minimum wage increase. Since then, dozens of studies have come out confirming what we knew all along — that a high minimum wage is economic suicide.
Instead of listening to starry-eyed liberal woo, listen to the empirical evidence and an overwhelming majority of economists and oppose a raise in the minimum wage.
And if you are a leftist, what you will find on the sites you trust will be something like this:A thesis should state an author’s opinion about a work of literature, so the thesis should not be a quotation, a paraphrase, or a summary of someone else’s ideas.
4. A thesis can study the effectiveness of teaching materials, include sample teaching materials to illustrate applications of the research, or provide empirical support for a . Getting Started: If you’re just beginning to think about a thesis, it may be useful to ask yourself some of the following questions.
This list is not exhaustive; anything that helps you consider your text or subject in a complex, unusual, or in-depth manner will get you on the right track. READING COMPREHENSION AND READING STRATEGIES Rebecca J. Baier A Research Paper Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the t Master -.
of~u~on Degree. A2A: Ideally, a thesis or any other paper should address one good clear question that is of interest to the audience (or whose importance can be clearly explained). But questions are fractal, so it depends on how you count.
A good question may have many parts, which (in most cases) you should try to. May 11, · Cornell Student Delivers Thesis In Underwear After Professor Questions Her Outfit A group of students defended the professor, writing that she was "noting the importance of professionalism." By.